WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.430 align:middle line:90% So this is a question for Elena. 00:00:02.430 --> 00:00:05.514 align:middle line:84% Have there been any developments about any of the animals 00:00:05.514 --> 00:00:06.264 align:middle line:90% that you've been-- 00:00:06.264 --> 00:00:07.212 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHING] 00:00:07.212 --> 00:00:09.990 align:middle line:84% --thinking about that you want to bring us up to date on. 00:00:09.990 --> 00:00:12.870 align:middle line:84% Yeah, I'm talking to the students 00:00:12.870 --> 00:00:14.850 align:middle line:84% tomorrow about reading your work aloud. 00:00:14.850 --> 00:00:20.850 align:middle line:84% And one tip is plant a possible question for the Q and A 00:00:20.850 --> 00:00:23.920 align:middle line:90% that somebody can ask first. 00:00:23.920 --> 00:00:25.920 align:middle line:84% And then it gets asked in the room this morning. 00:00:25.920 --> 00:00:27.030 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:00:27.030 --> 00:00:29.940 align:middle line:84% [INAUDIBLE] Yeah, so I have an essay 00:00:29.940 --> 00:00:33.390 align:middle line:84% on de-extinction in the book and this process of taking 00:00:33.390 --> 00:00:36.030 align:middle line:84% this cellular material of animals that aren't around 00:00:36.030 --> 00:00:38.580 align:middle line:84% anymore and trying to revive them 00:00:38.580 --> 00:00:40.530 align:middle line:84% through-- it used to be cloning and now 00:00:40.530 --> 00:00:42.330 align:middle line:90% kind of hybrid cell technology. 00:00:42.330 --> 00:00:45.630 align:middle line:90% 00:00:45.630 --> 00:00:48.210 align:middle line:84% And yes, it also talks about endlings. 00:00:48.210 --> 00:00:50.202 align:middle line:84% So when there's a last member of the species, 00:00:50.202 --> 00:00:51.160 align:middle line:90% it's called an endling. 00:00:51.160 --> 00:00:53.700 align:middle line:90% 00:00:53.700 --> 00:00:55.350 align:middle line:90% One of the endlings has died. 00:00:55.350 --> 00:00:59.040 align:middle line:84% So now there's a species in my book that says-- 00:00:59.040 --> 00:01:00.225 align:middle line:90% the book says it's alive. 00:01:00.225 --> 00:01:01.350 align:middle line:90% And it's not alive anymore. 00:01:01.350 --> 00:01:03.180 align:middle line:90% RIP Toughie the tree frog. 00:01:03.180 --> 00:01:06.480 align:middle line:84% But there's another species that has long 00:01:06.480 --> 00:01:10.830 align:middle line:84% been considered extinct that just two weeks ago people 00:01:10.830 --> 00:01:11.520 align:middle line:90% have spotted. 00:01:11.520 --> 00:01:14.820 align:middle line:84% Scientists say that the reported sightings 00:01:14.820 --> 00:01:18.103 align:middle line:84% are "credible rumors," whatever that means. 00:01:18.103 --> 00:01:19.770 align:middle line:84% When you're thinking of a de-extinction, 00:01:19.770 --> 00:01:20.700 align:middle line:90% it's kind of hard. 00:01:20.700 --> 00:01:24.930 align:middle line:84% You want to push away the charisma idea 00:01:24.930 --> 00:01:27.060 align:middle line:84% that we can clone a mammoth or something like that. 00:01:27.060 --> 00:01:28.890 align:middle line:84% You want to push it away and think more 00:01:28.890 --> 00:01:31.027 align:middle line:84% about cloning cells and things like that. 00:01:31.027 --> 00:01:33.360 align:middle line:84% And I tried really hard when I was writing the essay not 00:01:33.360 --> 00:01:36.340 align:middle line:84% to get too caught up in the idea of bringing back the passenger 00:01:36.340 --> 00:01:36.840 align:middle line:90% pigeon. 00:01:36.840 --> 00:01:38.570 align:middle line:84% And some people are so obsessed with it. 00:01:38.570 --> 00:01:40.237 align:middle line:84% But there's one animal that I was really 00:01:40.237 --> 00:01:43.230 align:middle line:90% into-- the Tasmanian Tiger. 00:01:43.230 --> 00:01:45.000 align:middle line:84% Have you ever seen the thylacine? 00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:46.890 align:middle line:84% It's this kind of striped marsupial 00:01:46.890 --> 00:01:50.250 align:middle line:84% that we just shot out of existence; 00:01:50.250 --> 00:01:53.310 align:middle line:84% people who emigrated to Tasmania and Australia did. 00:01:53.310 --> 00:01:54.150 align:middle line:90% And they were great. 00:01:54.150 --> 00:01:55.400 align:middle line:90% They didn't do anything wrong. 00:01:55.400 --> 00:01:58.530 align:middle line:84% And just two weeks ago, there are some incredible sightings 00:01:58.530 --> 00:02:01.470 align:middle line:84% that we might not need to de-extinct thylacines 00:02:01.470 --> 00:02:03.840 align:middle line:84% because Tasmanian Tigers might still-- 00:02:03.840 --> 00:02:06.390 align:middle line:84% Benjamin, the endling Tasmanian Tiger, 00:02:06.390 --> 00:02:09.413 align:middle line:84% might actually have been just a member of the species that 00:02:09.413 --> 00:02:10.080 align:middle line:90% still continues. 00:02:10.080 --> 00:02:11.700 align:middle line:84% So if you find some wood tonight-- 00:02:11.700 --> 00:02:12.580 align:middle line:90% [KNOCKS] 00:02:12.580 --> 00:02:14.370 align:middle line:84% Or if there are still thylacines, 00:02:14.370 --> 00:02:15.570 align:middle line:84% we'll probably do something terrible to them, 00:02:15.570 --> 00:02:16.920 align:middle line:84% like put them on American Idol or something. 00:02:16.920 --> 00:02:17.420 align:middle line:90% But-- 00:02:17.420 --> 00:02:18.060 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:02:18.060 --> 00:02:20.010 align:middle line:84% Cross your fingers because I really 00:02:20.010 --> 00:02:23.880 align:middle line:84% hope the book is wrong in that respect. 00:02:23.880 --> 00:02:26.820 align:middle line:84% Did you really plant that question [INAUDIBLE] or no? 00:02:26.820 --> 00:02:28.220 align:middle line:90% It felt like a plant. 00:02:28.220 --> 00:02:30.750 align:middle line:84% Well, I just said something at the very top of my thing, 00:02:30.750 --> 00:02:31.837 align:middle line:90% yeah, that I had a-- 00:02:31.837 --> 00:02:32.670 align:middle line:90% [INTERPOSING VOICES] 00:02:32.670 --> 00:02:34.190 align:middle line:90% Oh, right, right, right, right. 00:02:34.190 --> 00:02:34.800 align:middle line:90% I gotcha. 00:02:34.800 --> 00:02:38.560 align:middle line:90% 00:02:38.560 --> 00:02:41.238 align:middle line:90% Elizabeth? 00:02:41.238 --> 00:02:44.830 align:middle line:84% Well, I'd be curious to know of who else 00:02:44.830 --> 00:02:47.920 align:middle line:84% you read in the middle of the night. 00:02:47.920 --> 00:02:50.645 align:middle line:84% Who else you read in the middle of the night for the take. 00:02:50.645 --> 00:02:52.270 align:middle line:84% I could feel that question coming, too, 00:02:52.270 --> 00:02:54.220 align:middle line:84% because I feel like, even as I said, 00:02:54.220 --> 00:02:56.350 align:middle line:84% I actually don't read Salinger that much anymore. 00:02:56.350 --> 00:02:56.850 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHS] 00:02:56.850 --> 00:02:57.670 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:02:57.670 --> 00:03:01.600 align:middle line:84% But who are the writers I love that are 00:03:01.600 --> 00:03:06.670 align:middle line:84% those writers which may not be exactly my favorite writers? 00:03:06.670 --> 00:03:08.500 align:middle line:90% But I think a few come to mind. 00:03:08.500 --> 00:03:13.375 align:middle line:84% I'm a huge, huge fan of Simon Gray's Smoking Diaries. 00:03:13.375 --> 00:03:14.500 align:middle line:90% Is that a book people know? 00:03:14.500 --> 00:03:18.580 align:middle line:84% He was a relatively mid-late British playwright 00:03:18.580 --> 00:03:21.850 align:middle line:84% during the '50s and '60s and '70s. 00:03:21.850 --> 00:03:26.230 align:middle line:84% And then in this late career bloom, 00:03:26.230 --> 00:03:29.840 align:middle line:84% he kept a diary, a four-volume diaries which 00:03:29.840 --> 00:03:37.420 align:middle line:84% he called The Smoking Diaries of very much like Rembrandt's 00:03:37.420 --> 00:03:40.270 align:middle line:84% late self-portrait, is he's just thinking very, very 00:03:40.270 --> 00:03:44.710 align:middle line:84% hard about himself, his friends, basically dying. 00:03:44.710 --> 00:03:47.380 align:middle line:84% And it's an amazing, amazing book. 00:03:47.380 --> 00:03:50.500 align:middle line:84% It's also full of just wonderfully malicious gossip 00:03:50.500 --> 00:03:54.880 align:middle line:84% and great jokes and celebrity sightings. 00:03:54.880 --> 00:03:56.500 align:middle line:90% But it's an amazing book. 00:03:56.500 --> 00:03:59.650 align:middle line:84% I can't recommend it highly enough. 00:03:59.650 --> 00:04:01.360 align:middle line:90% It's hard to get in the US. 00:04:01.360 --> 00:04:03.010 align:middle line:84% It's sort of semi-available here. 00:04:03.010 --> 00:04:05.065 align:middle line:90% But you easily can find it. 00:04:05.065 --> 00:04:09.280 align:middle line:84% And sort of a similar four-book set, 00:04:09.280 --> 00:04:12.580 align:middle line:84% I love David Markson's last four books. 00:04:12.580 --> 00:04:16.240 align:middle line:84% Is Markson a writer that people know? 00:04:16.240 --> 00:04:19.870 align:middle line:84% He, too, interestingly was kind of a mid-late novelist. 00:04:19.870 --> 00:04:21.649 align:middle line:90% He wrote these detective novels. 00:04:21.649 --> 00:04:24.010 align:middle line:84% He wrote a book on Malcolm Lowry. 00:04:24.010 --> 00:04:30.970 align:middle line:84% And then again, there's an apparent theme, as Elena said, 00:04:30.970 --> 00:04:33.010 align:middle line:84% that when we're looking at the bear, 00:04:33.010 --> 00:04:35.740 align:middle line:84% that we're looking at ourselves of course. 00:04:35.740 --> 00:04:39.340 align:middle line:84% And it must be a theme of interest to me. 00:04:39.340 --> 00:04:41.950 align:middle line:84% But Markson's last four books, This 00:04:41.950 --> 00:04:47.740 align:middle line:84% Is Not A Novel, The Last Novel, Vanishing Point, and Reader's 00:04:47.740 --> 00:04:51.070 align:middle line:84% Block, are these amazing books of sort 00:04:51.070 --> 00:04:56.840 align:middle line:84% of curated quotations of him thinking 00:04:56.840 --> 00:05:00.305 align:middle line:84% very hard about the books that he's read. 00:05:00.305 --> 00:05:04.790 align:middle line:84% And each book is a remarkable meditation 00:05:04.790 --> 00:05:07.870 align:middle line:90% on a particular theme. 00:05:07.870 --> 00:05:11.840 align:middle line:84% A book of his, Vanishing Point, is the best book I know about 00:05:11.840 --> 00:05:14.210 align:middle line:90% post-9/11 America. 00:05:14.210 --> 00:05:18.740 align:middle line:90% And it barely mentions 9/11. 00:05:18.740 --> 00:05:21.770 align:middle line:84% So I'll count those eight books as eight. 00:05:21.770 --> 00:05:25.970 align:middle line:84% And I feel like I've answered Elizabeth's question more than 00:05:25.970 --> 00:05:26.750 align:middle line:90% halfway. 00:05:26.750 --> 00:05:28.638 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:05:28.638 --> 00:05:33.700 align:middle line:90% 00:05:33.700 --> 00:05:34.700 align:middle line:90% Well, that's more than-- 00:05:34.700 --> 00:05:35.670 align:middle line:90% OK. 00:05:35.670 --> 00:05:36.170 align:middle line:90% One more. 00:05:36.170 --> 00:05:39.270 align:middle line:90% 00:05:39.270 --> 00:05:42.570 align:middle line:90% About Jumbo II-- you know this. 00:05:42.570 --> 00:05:44.160 align:middle line:84% But for the benefit of the crowd, 00:05:44.160 --> 00:05:48.810 align:middle line:84% it's a chapter about the arrival of electricity and elephants 00:05:48.810 --> 00:05:51.660 align:middle line:84% in the United States in the late 19th century. 00:05:51.660 --> 00:05:55.720 align:middle line:84% And combining them doesn't really seem intuitive. 00:05:55.720 --> 00:05:58.350 align:middle line:84% But in your telling it, it's like mixing 00:05:58.350 --> 00:05:59.610 align:middle line:90% oxygen and gasoline. 00:05:59.610 --> 00:06:01.920 align:middle line:90% And it just explodes into fire. 00:06:01.920 --> 00:06:02.670 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:06:02.670 --> 00:06:06.510 align:middle line:84% My question was, was there a moment 00:06:06.510 --> 00:06:10.560 align:middle line:84% in your research when the two connected? 00:06:10.560 --> 00:06:11.350 align:middle line:90% Yeah, there was. 00:06:11.350 --> 00:06:13.200 align:middle line:90% You guys can hear me, right? 00:06:13.200 --> 00:06:17.080 align:middle line:84% So the moment was I discovered I was going down 00:06:17.080 --> 00:06:19.920 align:middle line:84% those procrastination research wormholes 00:06:19.920 --> 00:06:22.420 align:middle line:84% that you go down when you're not ready to start writing yet. 00:06:22.420 --> 00:06:24.087 align:middle line:84% And you're like, oh, no, I need to watch 00:06:24.087 --> 00:06:25.680 align:middle line:84% this fourth documentary about beavers 00:06:25.680 --> 00:06:27.810 align:middle line:84% and you're not even writing about beavers. 00:06:27.810 --> 00:06:28.904 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:06:28.904 --> 00:06:36.060 align:middle line:84% I found the newsletter blotter for the World's Fair in Buffalo 00:06:36.060 --> 00:06:40.245 align:middle line:84% where Jumbo II is completely unrelated to Jumbo 00:06:40.245 --> 00:06:44.190 align:middle line:84% I and wasn't nearly as famous or as exciting. 00:06:44.190 --> 00:06:48.030 align:middle line:84% But he does bear the distinction of being the first elephant 00:06:48.030 --> 00:06:50.830 align:middle line:84% that we tried to electrocute unsuccessfully. 00:06:50.830 --> 00:06:52.455 align:middle line:84% Hope I didn't give anything away there. 00:06:52.455 --> 00:06:53.830 align:middle line:84% Actually, I think you're probably 00:06:53.830 --> 00:06:57.330 align:middle line:84% more likely to read the essay knowing the elephant's OK. 00:06:57.330 --> 00:07:01.000 align:middle line:84% But he was electrocuted at this fair. 00:07:01.000 --> 00:07:04.410 align:middle line:84% And so I was researching this Buffalo fair. 00:07:04.410 --> 00:07:06.660 align:middle line:84% It's also the fair where President McKinley 00:07:06.660 --> 00:07:08.220 align:middle line:90% was assassinated. 00:07:08.220 --> 00:07:13.530 align:middle line:84% And his killer was electrocuted over the course of the fair. 00:07:13.530 --> 00:07:18.900 align:middle line:84% And I found this just maybe 80,000-word daily, 00:07:18.900 --> 00:07:21.570 align:middle line:84% sometimes bi-daily-- twice daily-- 00:07:21.570 --> 00:07:24.800 align:middle line:84% newsletter of the things that happened over 00:07:24.800 --> 00:07:26.550 align:middle line:84% the course of this World's Fair, which was 00:07:26.550 --> 00:07:28.800 align:middle line:90% about four months in length. 00:07:28.800 --> 00:07:30.720 align:middle line:90% Tesla had a part in it. 00:07:30.720 --> 00:07:36.360 align:middle line:84% And it had these collage moments in it where it would be like, 00:07:36.360 --> 00:07:39.570 align:middle line:84% 'The Ladies' Oratory society of Philadelphia showed up with 00:07:39.570 --> 00:07:41.100 align:middle line:90% their triangle collection.' 00:07:41.100 --> 00:07:43.333 align:middle line:84% 'Someone was run over by a streetcar' 00:07:43.333 --> 00:07:44.500 align:middle line:90% would be the next paragraph. 00:07:44.500 --> 00:07:46.170 align:middle line:90% And then 'Calamity Jane'-- 00:07:46.170 --> 00:07:48.330 align:middle line:84% who at the time must have been, like, 90-- 00:07:48.330 --> 00:07:51.420 align:middle line:84% 'passed out drunk in front of the Wild Bill Hickok show.' 00:07:51.420 --> 00:07:54.510 align:middle line:84% 'Oh, yeah, the president got murdered.' 'The flower show was 00:07:54.510 --> 00:07:55.680 align:middle line:90% very successful.' 00:07:55.680 --> 00:07:57.400 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:07:57.400 --> 00:08:02.340 align:middle line:84% It was this kind of awful and wonderful-- 00:08:02.340 --> 00:08:03.930 align:middle line:90% and I was feeling not nostalgia. 00:08:03.930 --> 00:08:06.420 align:middle line:84% But I was feeling this sort of old-timey glee 00:08:06.420 --> 00:08:08.130 align:middle line:84% at some of the details of the piece 00:08:08.130 --> 00:08:09.900 align:middle line:84% and also this kind of horror at the way 00:08:09.900 --> 00:08:11.430 align:middle line:90% that people were moving on. 00:08:11.430 --> 00:08:14.400 align:middle line:84% And the sort of pastiche, the pasting together of it 00:08:14.400 --> 00:08:16.260 align:middle line:84% all just really galvanized for me 00:08:16.260 --> 00:08:20.940 align:middle line:84% the idea that people were first electrocuted in Buffalo. 00:08:20.940 --> 00:08:26.370 align:middle line:84% The circus, elephant craze was huge in these big fairs. 00:08:26.370 --> 00:08:28.530 align:middle line:84% And electricity was born in Buffalo, New York. 00:08:28.530 --> 00:08:30.450 align:middle line:84% And the first person that we ever electrocuted 00:08:30.450 --> 00:08:31.492 align:middle line:90% was in Buffalo, New York. 00:08:31.492 --> 00:08:34.950 align:middle line:84% So both the fair and the way that the fair 00:08:34.950 --> 00:08:38.649 align:middle line:84% was reported in this document was the aha moment. 00:08:38.649 --> 00:08:39.524 align:middle line:90% Does that make sense? 00:08:39.524 --> 00:08:40.350 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:08:40.350 --> 00:08:41.767 align:middle line:84% Thanks, that was a great question. 00:08:41.767 --> 00:08:44.260 align:middle line:90% Thank you for asking. 00:08:44.260 --> 00:08:44.950 align:middle line:90% Great. 00:08:44.950 --> 00:08:46.150 align:middle line:90% Thank you both so much. 00:08:46.150 --> 00:08:47.817 align:middle line:84% More time for more questions [INAUDIBLE] 00:08:47.817 --> 00:08:49.380 align:middle line:90% [APPLAUSE]