WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.470 align:middle line:90% 00:00:05.470 --> 00:00:08.230 align:middle line:84% Hi, thanks for that awesome reading. 00:00:08.230 --> 00:00:10.540 align:middle line:84% I'm Ariel, I'm an undergrad, and I'm double majoring 00:00:10.540 --> 00:00:11.800 align:middle line:90% in creative writing and law. 00:00:11.800 --> 00:00:12.570 align:middle line:90% Yeah. 00:00:12.570 --> 00:00:14.510 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:00:14.510 --> 00:00:16.670 align:middle line:84% I was wondering if you could elaborate a little bit 00:00:16.670 --> 00:00:19.160 align:middle line:84% about where you see those two fields overlap 00:00:19.160 --> 00:00:22.050 align:middle line:84% for you in the little middle part of the Venn diagram, 00:00:22.050 --> 00:00:24.020 align:middle line:84% because I'm always curious to know? 00:00:24.020 --> 00:00:26.730 align:middle line:90% Yeah, that's a great question. 00:00:26.730 --> 00:00:28.520 align:middle line:84% I think they overlap in a lot of ways. 00:00:28.520 --> 00:00:31.940 align:middle line:90% I mean, just at a very-- 00:00:31.940 --> 00:00:35.840 align:middle line:84% kind of at the level of language, 00:00:35.840 --> 00:00:38.750 align:middle line:84% I think both creative writing and law, 00:00:38.750 --> 00:00:41.420 align:middle line:84% as we were talking about in the linguistics course today, 00:00:41.420 --> 00:00:46.280 align:middle line:84% are interested in those moments of ambiguity and possibility 00:00:46.280 --> 00:00:49.400 align:middle line:84% of multiple meanings, and thinking about how the way 00:00:49.400 --> 00:00:52.997 align:middle line:84% we use language in one context might differ in other contexts. 00:00:52.997 --> 00:00:54.830 align:middle line:84% It might mean something profoundly different 00:00:54.830 --> 00:00:57.770 align:middle line:90% and have profound consequences. 00:00:57.770 --> 00:01:00.590 align:middle line:84% And I also think, at a larger level, 00:01:00.590 --> 00:01:03.800 align:middle line:84% there's a lot of similarity between the two fields in terms 00:01:03.800 --> 00:01:07.700 align:middle line:84% of how we tell ourselves stories about ourselves, 00:01:07.700 --> 00:01:10.490 align:middle line:84% and how we organize the ways in which we live, 00:01:10.490 --> 00:01:12.050 align:middle line:90% and what we believe in. 00:01:12.050 --> 00:01:16.340 align:middle line:84% So for me, it's many of the same inquiries, 00:01:16.340 --> 00:01:19.220 align:middle line:84% just branching out into different texts 00:01:19.220 --> 00:01:20.300 align:middle line:90% and different directions. 00:01:20.300 --> 00:01:23.150 align:middle line:84% So I'm excited to hear that you're doing both. 00:01:23.150 --> 00:01:35.700 align:middle line:90% 00:01:35.700 --> 00:01:37.020 align:middle line:90% Hi, I'm also Natalie. 00:01:37.020 --> 00:01:39.810 align:middle line:90% 00:01:39.810 --> 00:01:43.497 align:middle line:84% I did a project on Hard Child in my 209 intro to poetry class, 00:01:43.497 --> 00:01:44.580 align:middle line:90% so I'm excited to see you. 00:01:44.580 --> 00:01:46.090 align:middle line:90% Oh, that's awesome. 00:01:46.090 --> 00:01:48.730 align:middle line:84% And I had a question, because when I was reading your book, 00:01:48.730 --> 00:01:51.000 align:middle line:84% I really loved the way that you convey humor, 00:01:51.000 --> 00:01:52.885 align:middle line:84% because it didn't seem like you were-- 00:01:52.885 --> 00:01:55.260 align:middle line:84% at least, I know when I write, I struggle to write humor, 00:01:55.260 --> 00:01:57.300 align:middle line:84% because I feel like I'm either coming across too strong, 00:01:57.300 --> 00:01:58.925 align:middle line:84% or it's not enough and I'm just kind of 00:01:58.925 --> 00:02:00.540 align:middle line:90% left lacking a punch line. 00:02:00.540 --> 00:02:02.080 align:middle line:90% How do you write humor? 00:02:02.080 --> 00:02:03.720 align:middle line:84% Do you just find that it comes easily, 00:02:03.720 --> 00:02:06.600 align:middle line:84% or do you feel like you're trying to push it sometimes? 00:02:06.600 --> 00:02:09.240 align:middle line:84% But either way, I think yours comes across very well. 00:02:09.240 --> 00:02:10.630 align:middle line:90% I love your sense of humor. 00:02:10.630 --> 00:02:12.990 align:middle line:90% Thanks. 00:02:12.990 --> 00:02:17.670 align:middle line:84% Yeah, so a lot of the jokes that are in my poems, 00:02:17.670 --> 00:02:21.330 align:middle line:84% they're jokes that I tried to make in conversation 00:02:21.330 --> 00:02:24.930 align:middle line:90% and they were flops. 00:02:24.930 --> 00:02:29.280 align:middle line:84% So there's actually a poem in Hard Child 00:02:29.280 --> 00:02:32.850 align:middle line:84% that's called "Person's Ocean," that was like this joke-- 00:02:32.850 --> 00:02:34.530 align:middle line:84% I hadn't written it for a poem, I just 00:02:34.530 --> 00:02:36.780 align:middle line:84% wrote it because I thought it'd be hugely entertaining 00:02:36.780 --> 00:02:38.040 align:middle line:90% for my friends. 00:02:38.040 --> 00:02:41.580 align:middle line:84% And this is-- do you want to hear the joke? 00:02:41.580 --> 00:02:43.560 align:middle line:90% OK. 00:02:43.560 --> 00:02:46.380 align:middle line:84% So it's like, Oh, you know how when 00:02:46.380 --> 00:02:49.560 align:middle line:84% you're walking on the beach and you pick up a seashell 00:02:49.560 --> 00:02:52.020 align:middle line:90% you can hear the ocean? 00:02:52.020 --> 00:02:53.970 align:middle line:84% Well if you are walking on the beach 00:02:53.970 --> 00:02:57.010 align:middle line:84% and there's a person there, and you go close to them, 00:02:57.010 --> 00:03:00.900 align:middle line:84% you also can hear the ocean, but only the parts of the ocean 00:03:00.900 --> 00:03:02.200 align:middle line:90% that humanity destroyed. 00:03:02.200 --> 00:03:05.490 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:03:05.490 --> 00:03:07.710 align:middle line:90% And everyone was like, what? 00:03:07.710 --> 00:03:12.660 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:03:12.660 --> 00:03:15.390 align:middle line:84% And so, I feel like I try to find jokes 00:03:15.390 --> 00:03:16.890 align:middle line:90% for the poem that are-- 00:03:16.890 --> 00:03:20.550 align:middle line:84% for poems that are-- there's something off about them, 00:03:20.550 --> 00:03:24.270 align:middle line:84% because I think if all the moving parts work, 00:03:24.270 --> 00:03:26.190 align:middle line:84% and the joke totally makes sense, 00:03:26.190 --> 00:03:29.280 align:middle line:84% it doesn't have that kind of element of disquiet 00:03:29.280 --> 00:03:30.340 align:middle line:90% that's behind it. 00:03:30.340 --> 00:03:35.220 align:middle line:84% So I am always interested in those jokes that almost miss. 00:03:35.220 --> 00:03:47.310 align:middle line:90% 00:03:47.310 --> 00:03:49.620 align:middle line:90% What's a Staten Island divorce? 00:03:49.620 --> 00:03:53.970 align:middle line:84% Oh, it's when one spouse kills the other one. 00:03:53.970 --> 00:03:56.445 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:03:56.445 --> 00:04:16.857 align:middle line:90% 00:04:16.857 --> 00:04:17.940 align:middle line:90% That was a great question. 00:04:17.940 --> 00:04:20.892 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:04:20.892 --> 00:04:26.310 align:middle line:90% 00:04:26.310 --> 00:04:29.490 align:middle line:84% OK well, thank you so much for your questions, 00:04:29.490 --> 00:04:32.250 align:middle line:84% and thank you so much Natalie for a great reading. 00:04:32.250 --> 00:04:38.310 align:middle line:84% And we have some books here for you to buy, and for-- 00:04:38.310 --> 00:04:40.710 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:04:40.710 --> 00:04:42.420 align:middle line:90% I'll take them, sold. 00:04:42.420 --> 00:04:45.990 align:middle line:90% 00:04:45.990 --> 00:04:47.580 align:middle line:90% Yes, thank you very much. 00:04:47.580 --> 00:04:48.120 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:04:48.120 --> 00:04:51.470 align:middle line:90% [APPLAUSE] 00:04:51.470 --> 00:04:54.000 align:middle line:90%