WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.870 align:middle line:90% Thank you. 00:00:00.870 --> 00:00:10.650 align:middle line:90% 00:00:10.650 --> 00:00:13.970 align:middle line:84% This will mostly not be a formal deal. 00:00:13.970 --> 00:00:18.060 align:middle line:84% I did have six or seven pages here that I 00:00:18.060 --> 00:00:20.610 align:middle line:90% would like to begin with. 00:00:20.610 --> 00:00:32.670 align:middle line:84% And then if I'm still here we'll go into a little discussion 00:00:32.670 --> 00:00:38.760 align:middle line:84% of particular writers who, in various, vastly different ways, 00:00:38.760 --> 00:00:46.560 align:middle line:84% embody this notion of the poem as a kind of meeting place. 00:00:46.560 --> 00:00:48.850 align:middle line:90% Can you hear me back there? 00:00:48.850 --> 00:00:49.802 align:middle line:90% No, not really. 00:00:49.802 --> 00:00:56.023 align:middle line:90% 00:00:56.023 --> 00:00:56.940 align:middle line:90% I'll try to be louder. 00:00:56.940 --> 00:00:57.440 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:00:57.440 --> 00:01:06.010 align:middle line:90% 00:01:06.010 --> 00:01:08.580 align:middle line:84% And at the appropriate time, particularly when 00:01:08.580 --> 00:01:11.080 align:middle line:84% we're talking about individual poets, 00:01:11.080 --> 00:01:18.330 align:middle line:84% to change this into an exchange if you 00:01:18.330 --> 00:01:23.636 align:middle line:84% are interested in the particular writers and material 00:01:23.636 --> 00:01:28.690 align:middle line:84% that we're dealing with, the persons of a poem. 00:01:28.690 --> 00:01:31.210 align:middle line:90% 00:01:31.210 --> 00:01:34.900 align:middle line:84% On cable TV recently I surprisingly 00:01:34.900 --> 00:01:38.290 align:middle line:84% came across the documentary Derrida 00:01:38.290 --> 00:01:42.030 align:middle line:84% in which some young people follow the French philosopher 00:01:42.030 --> 00:01:45.510 align:middle line:84% cameras in both his domestic and professional life 00:01:45.510 --> 00:01:47.910 align:middle line:84% and constructed a personal portrait 00:01:47.910 --> 00:01:49.920 align:middle line:90% over a couple of years. 00:01:49.920 --> 00:01:53.310 align:middle line:84% Occasionally they would insert a quote from Derrida 00:01:53.310 --> 00:01:55.690 align:middle line:90% along the bottom of the picture. 00:01:55.690 --> 00:01:59.190 align:middle line:84% One in particular caught my eye and stayed with me. 00:01:59.190 --> 00:02:04.560 align:middle line:84% Quote "The determination of the self as one is violence. 00:02:04.560 --> 00:02:08.100 align:middle line:90% 00:02:08.100 --> 00:02:10.860 align:middle line:84% Determination of the self as one is violence." 00:02:10.860 --> 00:02:13.410 align:middle line:90% 00:02:13.410 --> 00:02:15.540 align:middle line:84% And that struck me as good a place 00:02:15.540 --> 00:02:17.760 align:middle line:84% to begin this little talk as any. 00:02:17.760 --> 00:02:19.200 align:middle line:90% This talk on what? 00:02:19.200 --> 00:02:20.610 align:middle line:90% We'll see. 00:02:20.610 --> 00:02:22.950 align:middle line:84% The persons of the poem, I suppose, 00:02:22.950 --> 00:02:28.170 align:middle line:84% and its space, the poem's space, both metaphorical and actual, 00:02:28.170 --> 00:02:31.890 align:middle line:84% and the present of the poem, and the future past, 00:02:31.890 --> 00:02:34.800 align:middle line:90% and the historical present. 00:02:34.800 --> 00:02:37.020 align:middle line:84% I'd better hasten to add that it will not 00:02:37.020 --> 00:02:39.820 align:middle line:84% be about Derrida or deconstruction, 00:02:39.820 --> 00:02:43.707 align:middle line:84% so you may all return to your seats, or both of you 00:02:43.707 --> 00:02:45.540 align:middle line:84% may return to your seats, whichever applies. 00:02:45.540 --> 00:02:48.270 align:middle line:90% 00:02:48.270 --> 00:02:50.010 align:middle line:84% Since I'm reminded that it is always 00:02:50.010 --> 00:02:52.650 align:middle line:84% difficult to anticipate the nature of the audience, 00:02:52.650 --> 00:02:56.280 align:middle line:84% and therefore the conversation, when we are engaged with poetry 00:02:56.280 --> 00:02:59.490 align:middle line:84% and poetics, we do trust that a conversation takes 00:02:59.490 --> 00:03:03.060 align:middle line:84% place even if only one within the poem itself, 00:03:03.060 --> 00:03:06.450 align:middle line:84% and that too is part of our topic. 00:03:06.450 --> 00:03:09.210 align:middle line:84% I must confess that I find it particularly difficult to know 00:03:09.210 --> 00:03:12.540 align:middle line:84% how to address you this afternoon in the name 00:03:12.540 --> 00:03:15.960 align:middle line:84% of poetry, when it seems to me that our Republic 00:03:15.960 --> 00:03:19.260 align:middle line:84% and its foundational language and values and its place 00:03:19.260 --> 00:03:24.360 align:middle line:84% in the world of nations are all under such relentless assault. 00:03:24.360 --> 00:03:28.350 align:middle line:84% I speak now of the assault from within, 00:03:28.350 --> 00:03:31.920 align:middle line:84% an assault conducted by means of those very words we take 00:03:31.920 --> 00:03:36.900 align:middle line:84% as basic to just governance, freedom, liberty, democracy, 00:03:36.900 --> 00:03:38.100 align:middle line:90% justice. 00:03:38.100 --> 00:03:40.410 align:middle line:84% Words whose currency has been debased 00:03:40.410 --> 00:03:43.260 align:middle line:84% in the purported support of those things they are meant 00:03:43.260 --> 00:03:47.580 align:middle line:84% to secure, openness, candor, respect for others, 00:03:47.580 --> 00:03:50.550 align:middle line:84% and for difference, and for the varieties of life 00:03:50.550 --> 00:03:52.860 align:middle line:90% on the planet. 00:03:52.860 --> 00:03:56.040 align:middle line:84% What could a poetic signify in such times? 00:03:56.040 --> 00:04:00.330 align:middle line:84% What is the necessity of poetry beyond the blasé of poetry 00:04:00.330 --> 00:04:03.780 align:middle line:90% of instrumentality and harangue? 00:04:03.780 --> 00:04:08.100 align:middle line:84% What use poetry's weak and strong voices, quiet and loud 00:04:08.100 --> 00:04:11.970 align:middle line:84% voices, its celebration of otherness and difference, 00:04:11.970 --> 00:04:16.890 align:middle line:84% of the play of imagination and reason, chants and pattern, 00:04:16.890 --> 00:04:22.320 align:middle line:84% chaos and order, dreamed and waking consciousness? 00:04:22.320 --> 00:04:27.090 align:middle line:84% We seem to be searching now, and perhaps always, 00:04:27.090 --> 00:04:31.480 align:middle line:84% within the present for a present that is not, 00:04:31.480 --> 00:04:35.550 align:middle line:84% a present in place of the one offered and ordained, 00:04:35.550 --> 00:04:38.550 align:middle line:84% product of some monstrous devolution of thought 00:04:38.550 --> 00:04:41.790 align:middle line:90% and the inebriation of power. 00:04:41.790 --> 00:04:45.870 align:middle line:84% We search for the body of the poem, veiled or cloaked 00:04:45.870 --> 00:04:48.840 align:middle line:90% as it is in our time. 00:04:48.840 --> 00:04:52.590 align:middle line:84% The body of the poem, its presence, only a small number 00:04:52.590 --> 00:04:55.520 align:middle line:90% of poems find this. 00:04:55.520 --> 00:04:58.280 align:middle line:84% That poem that is fashioned at once alone 00:04:58.280 --> 00:05:01.820 align:middle line:84% and in company, an impossible thing, 00:05:01.820 --> 00:05:06.560 align:middle line:84% ungovernable, and exiled, and without power. 00:05:06.560 --> 00:05:11.850 align:middle line:84% That eternal tradition of examining things as they are, 00:05:11.850 --> 00:05:15.800 align:middle line:84% and as they are said to be, by means of a language 00:05:15.800 --> 00:05:19.610 align:middle line:84% everywhere present around us and within us, 00:05:19.610 --> 00:05:23.870 align:middle line:84% within language itself, but unheard. 00:05:23.870 --> 00:05:28.850 align:middle line:84% A world, some might say, of misrule, wherein we experience 00:05:28.850 --> 00:05:32.150 align:middle line:84% the truth of the poem's lies, and the lies 00:05:32.150 --> 00:05:35.540 align:middle line:84% of the state's truths and absolutes, where 00:05:35.540 --> 00:05:39.890 align:middle line:84% the subversions and refusals of the poem, its nothings, 00:05:39.890 --> 00:05:44.780 align:middle line:84% its disorders, counter the institutionalized corruption 00:05:44.780 --> 00:05:50.630 align:middle line:84% of the logos, the word, and the nomos, the law. 00:05:50.630 --> 00:05:57.890 align:middle line:84% We employ encomium, praise, and satire, ridicule, 00:05:57.890 --> 00:06:01.580 align:middle line:84% but let us not forget lyric and its insistence 00:06:01.580 --> 00:06:07.631 align:middle line:84% on desire, the desiring self in the face of repression. 00:06:07.631 --> 00:06:11.090 align:middle line:84% It reminds me, of course always, of the force 00:06:11.090 --> 00:06:14.810 align:middle line:84% of this particular nothing, individual desire. 00:06:14.810 --> 00:06:18.800 align:middle line:84% When you think, for example that Anna Akhmatova was 00:06:18.800 --> 00:06:24.620 align:middle line:84% capable of terrifying Stalin by writing love poems. 00:06:24.620 --> 00:06:31.820 align:middle line:84% This is great, the new terrorism, the old one. 00:06:31.820 --> 00:06:36.530 align:middle line:84% The space of the poem is a space of debate, and staging, 00:06:36.530 --> 00:06:42.020 align:middle line:84% and conversation among ourselves, and there others, 00:06:42.020 --> 00:06:46.640 align:middle line:84% and those voices that precede, and those yet to come. 00:06:46.640 --> 00:06:51.500 align:middle line:84% The figures therein, the figura, are not ours. 00:06:51.500 --> 00:06:53.390 align:middle line:84% It is an alternative space at once 00:06:53.390 --> 00:06:58.940 align:middle line:84% outside and inside, as any space can be at a given moment. 00:06:58.940 --> 00:07:05.360 align:middle line:84% This room, for example, this stanza, should we so insist, 00:07:05.360 --> 00:07:09.380 align:middle line:84% it is perhaps the only space where I am truly at home since 00:07:09.380 --> 00:07:14.750 align:middle line:84% I cannot recognize myself there, or here. 00:07:14.750 --> 00:07:17.090 align:middle line:90% Who are the persons of the poem? 00:07:17.090 --> 00:07:20.720 align:middle line:84% Let me begin by reading a poem that that phrase popped out 00:07:20.720 --> 00:07:24.130 align:middle line:84% of when I began to think about this talk. 00:07:24.130 --> 00:07:26.000 align:middle line:90%