WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.410 align:middle line:90% Yes. 00:00:01.410 --> 00:00:04.337 align:middle line:84% How did your approach differ in terms of content? 00:00:04.337 --> 00:00:10.907 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE] 00:00:10.907 --> 00:00:12.240 align:middle line:90% Sorry, I'm not quite getting it. 00:00:12.240 --> 00:00:13.865 align:middle line:84% How does the approach to writing poetry 00:00:13.865 --> 00:00:15.780 align:middle line:90% differ in terms of content? 00:00:15.780 --> 00:00:16.636 align:middle line:90% [INAUDIBLE]? 00:00:16.636 --> 00:00:22.614 align:middle line:90% 00:00:22.614 --> 00:00:25.564 align:middle line:84% How does the approach to those [INAUDIBLE] structure 00:00:25.564 --> 00:00:28.600 align:middle line:90% of those poems differ? 00:00:28.600 --> 00:00:29.100 align:middle line:90% Yeah. 00:00:29.100 --> 00:00:32.280 align:middle line:84% That's another really good question, 00:00:32.280 --> 00:00:34.650 align:middle line:84% because it is the case that I would have answered this 00:00:34.650 --> 00:00:39.120 align:middle line:84% in a certain way while writing my first two books, 00:00:39.120 --> 00:00:42.570 align:middle line:84% and that I can no longer answer it in the same way. 00:00:42.570 --> 00:00:49.680 align:middle line:84% Here it goes-- my first two books were very aware, 00:00:49.680 --> 00:00:51.480 align:middle line:84% our priority, even before hitting 00:00:51.480 --> 00:00:54.840 align:middle line:84% the page of what more or less the subject of the poem 00:00:54.840 --> 00:00:55.795 align:middle line:90% was going to be. 00:00:55.795 --> 00:00:58.170 align:middle line:84% I was going to write about this particular place in South 00:00:58.170 --> 00:01:00.360 align:middle line:84% Africa, or this particular event in South Africa, 00:01:00.360 --> 00:01:03.540 align:middle line:84% or this particular relationship within a family and so on, 00:01:03.540 --> 00:01:05.530 align:middle line:90% this moment in history. 00:01:05.530 --> 00:01:10.470 align:middle line:84% So there was a content-driven dimension 00:01:10.470 --> 00:01:12.690 align:middle line:90% to the origin of the poems. 00:01:12.690 --> 00:01:16.650 align:middle line:84% Whereas, now the question doesn't 00:01:16.650 --> 00:01:21.540 align:middle line:84% apply in anything like the dichotomy that it suggests. 00:01:21.540 --> 00:01:24.060 align:middle line:84% There is no distinction now when I 00:01:24.060 --> 00:01:26.670 align:middle line:84% hit the page, in terms of is this going 00:01:26.670 --> 00:01:28.260 align:middle line:84% to be driven by content, is this going 00:01:28.260 --> 00:01:31.230 align:middle line:84% to be driven by the way the language seems to be moving, 00:01:31.230 --> 00:01:34.830 align:middle line:84% the way in which other parts of the mind are being magnetized. 00:01:34.830 --> 00:01:36.930 align:middle line:84% It's a much more intuitive process now, 00:01:36.930 --> 00:01:41.160 align:middle line:84% in which the distinctions between content and linguistic 00:01:41.160 --> 00:01:45.540 align:middle line:90% energy are becoming blurred. 00:01:45.540 --> 00:01:47.830 align:middle line:90% There's a greater autonomy. 00:01:47.830 --> 00:01:49.920 align:middle line:84% It's as if I want to hear what's coming up 00:01:49.920 --> 00:01:53.430 align:middle line:84% towards me from the back side of the page, 00:01:53.430 --> 00:01:55.605 align:middle line:84% rather than what's coming from me to the page. 00:01:55.605 --> 00:01:58.440 align:middle line:90% 00:01:58.440 --> 00:01:59.220 align:middle line:90% Can I listen? 00:01:59.220 --> 00:02:02.700 align:middle line:84% That's why many of these poems are obsessed with achieving 00:02:02.700 --> 00:02:03.960 align:middle line:90% the capacity to listen. 00:02:03.960 --> 00:02:07.700 align:middle line:90% 00:02:07.700 --> 00:02:11.850 align:middle line:84% So that's where I am at the moment. 00:02:11.850 --> 00:02:15.390 align:middle line:84% And clearly, once one is in that position-- 00:02:15.390 --> 00:02:17.390 align:middle line:90% this would be my dream-- 00:02:17.390 --> 00:02:20.180 align:middle line:84% there is a potential for integration, 00:02:20.180 --> 00:02:23.450 align:middle line:84% because you are not hierarchically saying, 00:02:23.450 --> 00:02:27.140 align:middle line:84% I'm choosing this at the expense of that. 00:02:27.140 --> 00:02:29.090 align:middle line:84% To come back to my metaphor of the field, 00:02:29.090 --> 00:02:32.240 align:middle line:84% I'm rather going to be the field in which, 00:02:32.240 --> 00:02:35.150 align:middle line:84% if I listen long enough, the sounds of the field will emerge 00:02:35.150 --> 00:02:40.250 align:middle line:84% and they will be biologically diverse, if we've 00:02:40.250 --> 00:02:45.460 align:middle line:84% got a healthy environment in the soul. 00:02:45.460 --> 00:02:48.000 align:middle line:90%