WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.050 align:middle line:90% 00:00:03.050 --> 00:00:07.010 align:middle line:84% This question is for, I guess, Cecilia, 00:00:07.010 --> 00:00:10.580 align:middle line:84% but also I'm interested in how it connects with the Trayvon 00:00:10.580 --> 00:00:13.640 align:middle line:90% Martin videos that we saw. 00:00:13.640 --> 00:00:19.220 align:middle line:84% I was wondering if we could think about the medium and what 00:00:19.220 --> 00:00:21.770 align:middle line:84% effect that might have on how you're treating the subject. 00:00:21.770 --> 00:00:24.875 align:middle line:84% Like, you said that pulling things 00:00:24.875 --> 00:00:26.000 align:middle line:90% that have already happened. 00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:29.060 align:middle line:84% Pulling that forward, bringing that back, and making it sort 00:00:29.060 --> 00:00:31.050 align:middle line:90% of present and contemporary. 00:00:31.050 --> 00:00:35.360 align:middle line:84% And at the same time, I was wondering, 00:00:35.360 --> 00:00:37.520 align:middle line:84% how does that work with making a film? 00:00:37.520 --> 00:00:38.330 align:middle line:90% Versus, Cecilia. 00:00:38.330 --> 00:00:42.500 align:middle line:90% Your piece, it's improvisation. 00:00:42.500 --> 00:00:44.695 align:middle line:84% You're working from a script, but at the same time, 00:00:44.695 --> 00:00:46.820 align:middle line:84% you're talking, you're commenting, on the audience. 00:00:46.820 --> 00:00:47.570 align:middle line:90% You're interacting with us. 00:00:47.570 --> 00:00:49.237 align:middle line:84% So I was wondering about the differences 00:00:49.237 --> 00:00:52.640 align:middle line:84% between film and improvisation and that idea? 00:00:52.640 --> 00:00:54.890 align:middle line:84% But both of you seem to be really interested in making 00:00:54.890 --> 00:00:57.290 align:middle line:84% history present, palpable, something 00:00:57.290 --> 00:00:58.670 align:middle line:90% that can be manipulated. 00:00:58.670 --> 00:00:59.954 align:middle line:90% You go first. 00:00:59.954 --> 00:01:02.270 align:middle line:90% I'm thinking, so you go. 00:01:02.270 --> 00:01:04.370 align:middle line:90% OK. 00:01:04.370 --> 00:01:07.380 align:middle line:84% Yeah, I will not speak about film-- 00:01:07.380 --> 00:01:09.680 align:middle line:90% even though I also do film-- 00:01:09.680 --> 00:01:13.230 align:middle line:84% because I would like for Claudia to take care of that part. 00:01:13.230 --> 00:01:16.920 align:middle line:84% But about the improvisation decision-- 00:01:16.920 --> 00:01:18.920 align:middle line:90% isn't it a beautiful word? 00:01:18.920 --> 00:01:24.500 align:middle line:84% "Visation" is visualize, and "im" is the improbable, 00:01:24.500 --> 00:01:27.500 align:middle line:84% so it's like seeing the improbable. 00:01:27.500 --> 00:01:29.450 align:middle line:90% And where is it? 00:01:29.450 --> 00:01:33.050 align:middle line:84% It's nowhere to be seen until it happens, 00:01:33.050 --> 00:01:37.640 align:middle line:84% so it's actually happening for you to be part of. 00:01:37.640 --> 00:01:42.530 align:middle line:84% So it's like where is our act taking place? 00:01:42.530 --> 00:01:47.090 align:middle line:84% Is it in the past, in the present, or the future? 00:01:47.090 --> 00:01:51.590 align:middle line:84% Just before coming here, I was watching this really bad, 00:01:51.590 --> 00:01:54.590 align:middle line:90% discovery, scientific film. 00:01:54.590 --> 00:01:58.130 align:middle line:84% And there was a discovery that has 00:01:58.130 --> 00:02:02.690 align:middle line:84% been made in quantum physics that confirms a discovery that 00:02:02.690 --> 00:02:06.530 align:middle line:84% has been made first in neuroscience, which 00:02:06.530 --> 00:02:12.920 align:middle line:84% is that all living organisms, starting from unicellular 00:02:12.920 --> 00:02:18.170 align:middle line:84% beings, have this anticipatory capacity. 00:02:18.170 --> 00:02:22.500 align:middle line:84% Because information is coming from the future. 00:02:22.500 --> 00:02:25.910 align:middle line:84% And so improvisation is really coming 00:02:25.910 --> 00:02:31.020 align:middle line:84% from the future for what can be if you let it be. 00:02:31.020 --> 00:02:33.960 align:middle line:90% So where is it? 00:02:33.960 --> 00:02:40.350 align:middle line:84% And that is the feeling I seek when I come into a room 00:02:40.350 --> 00:02:46.560 align:middle line:84% where there is this precious presence of everybody, 00:02:46.560 --> 00:02:48.060 align:middle line:90% this togetherness. 00:02:48.060 --> 00:02:52.500 align:middle line:84% And when I arrived here, there was a little homage 00:02:52.500 --> 00:02:57.360 align:middle line:84% to Stacy Doris, so I included some of the lines by Stacy. 00:02:57.360 --> 00:02:58.980 align:middle line:90% I hope you noticed. 00:02:58.980 --> 00:03:01.770 align:middle line:84% And she has this profound meditation 00:03:01.770 --> 00:03:07.200 align:middle line:84% on the eye that is plural, and on the west, she says. 00:03:07.200 --> 00:03:11.910 align:middle line:84% And I thought, so beautiful, and so I wanted to bring that in. 00:03:11.910 --> 00:03:18.084 align:middle line:90% 00:03:18.084 --> 00:03:24.200 align:middle line:84% The medium of film is, by nature, collaborative. 00:03:24.200 --> 00:03:25.860 align:middle line:84% And because it's collaborative, it 00:03:25.860 --> 00:03:28.750 align:middle line:84% means that you are always improvising with the people 00:03:28.750 --> 00:03:30.030 align:middle line:90% you're working with. 00:03:30.030 --> 00:03:32.610 align:middle line:84% There's no straight arrow in terms 00:03:32.610 --> 00:03:34.710 align:middle line:90% of intention and execution. 00:03:34.710 --> 00:03:37.800 align:middle line:90% 00:03:37.800 --> 00:03:40.950 align:middle line:84% So for instance, in this film, I was 00:03:40.950 --> 00:03:47.160 align:middle line:84% really interested in using President Obama's statement 00:03:47.160 --> 00:03:49.970 align:middle line:84% that, "This could be a son of mine," 00:03:49.970 --> 00:03:54.160 align:middle line:90% and also the actual target. 00:03:54.160 --> 00:03:57.570 align:middle line:90% And my husband said, No. 00:03:57.570 --> 00:04:04.610 align:middle line:84% He was not interested in replicating that moment. 00:04:04.610 --> 00:04:08.120 align:middle line:84% And I said, Well, I bet you a lot of people 00:04:08.120 --> 00:04:10.610 align:middle line:90% haven't seen that moment. 00:04:10.610 --> 00:04:13.230 align:middle line:90% And he said, I don't care. 00:04:13.230 --> 00:04:15.620 align:middle line:84% I don't want to replicate that moment. 00:04:15.620 --> 00:04:17.600 align:middle line:84% And I said, Well, maybe we could just put it 00:04:17.600 --> 00:04:19.413 align:middle line:90% in, and see and take it out-- 00:04:19.413 --> 00:04:22.070 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:04:22.070 --> 00:04:23.570 align:middle line:90% --if it's not working. 00:04:23.570 --> 00:04:26.650 align:middle line:84% But he is in control of what goes in, 00:04:26.650 --> 00:04:30.252 align:middle line:84% because he does the technical stuff, so it never goes. 00:04:30.252 --> 00:04:33.560 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:04:33.560 --> 00:04:34.060 align:middle line:90% 00:04:34.060 --> 00:04:38.100 align:middle line:84% The men that are in, those are all, actually, 00:04:38.100 --> 00:04:40.250 align:middle line:84% Pomona students and Pitzer students. 00:04:40.250 --> 00:04:43.370 align:middle line:84% And it was interesting when we were 00:04:43.370 --> 00:04:48.320 align:middle line:84% at the sneaker store, which had a lot of hoodies in that store. 00:04:48.320 --> 00:04:51.410 align:middle line:84% We had asked these guys if they would show up, 00:04:51.410 --> 00:04:53.660 align:middle line:84% and they were supposed to show up at 7 o'clock, 00:04:53.660 --> 00:04:55.702 align:middle line:84% because the guy who owned the store said we could 00:04:55.702 --> 00:04:57.050 align:middle line:90% film in the store at 7 o'clock. 00:04:57.050 --> 00:05:01.010 align:middle line:84% And at 7:05, I thought, What if none of them come? 00:05:01.010 --> 00:05:04.400 align:middle line:84% And then we began to see them on the street coming 00:05:04.400 --> 00:05:07.790 align:middle line:90% from different directions. 00:05:07.790 --> 00:05:09.290 align:middle line:84% And then once they got in the store, 00:05:09.290 --> 00:05:11.090 align:middle line:84% we didn't tell them to do anything. 00:05:11.090 --> 00:05:13.880 align:middle line:84% We just said, Here's some hoodies. 00:05:13.880 --> 00:05:15.260 align:middle line:90% Here's some sneakers. 00:05:15.260 --> 00:05:16.370 align:middle line:90% Here's a store. 00:05:16.370 --> 00:05:21.860 align:middle line:84% Go in there, and we're going to film you. 00:05:21.860 --> 00:05:26.420 align:middle line:84% And then, two of them were friends, and two more friends, 00:05:26.420 --> 00:05:28.040 align:middle line:90% and one of them knew some-- 00:05:28.040 --> 00:05:32.580 align:middle line:84% and it was just interesting to see how they would interact. 00:05:32.580 --> 00:05:37.580 align:middle line:84% So I think, partly, you say, We need you to go in there 00:05:37.580 --> 00:05:39.350 align:middle line:90% and try on some hoodies. 00:05:39.350 --> 00:05:40.970 align:middle line:90% But then that's it. 00:05:40.970 --> 00:05:43.820 align:middle line:90% Then they do what they want. 00:05:43.820 --> 00:05:50.640 align:middle line:84% Yeah, so it's the medium, but it's full of chance in a sense. 00:05:50.640 --> 00:05:51.640 align:middle line:90% [LOUD SNEEZE] 00:05:51.640 --> 00:05:52.140 align:middle line:90% Ooh! 00:05:52.140 --> 00:05:53.990 align:middle line:90% Bless you. 00:05:53.990 --> 00:05:55.000 align:middle line:90%