WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.386 align:middle line:90%


00:00:01.386 --> 00:00:03.700 align:middle line:90%
[INAUDIBLE]

00:00:03.700 --> 00:00:05.860 align:middle line:84%
You're in the element
of writing when reading

00:00:05.860 --> 00:00:07.510 align:middle line:90%
the text [INAUDIBLE] resists.

00:00:07.510 --> 00:00:10.693 align:middle line:84%
And I was wondering if you could
talk a little bit about some

00:00:10.693 --> 00:00:14.350 align:middle line:90%
of the texts [INAUDIBLE].

00:00:14.261 --> 00:00:16.775 align:middle line:84%
La question, je crois,
dans l'ensemble c'est

00:00:16.856 --> 00:00:19.533 align:middle line:84%
est-ce que vous êtes
dans l'élément de l'écriture

00:00:19.598 --> 00:00:20.691 align:middle line:90%
en lisant le poème ?

00:00:20.691 --> 00:00:21.040 align:middle line:90%
Is that right?

00:00:21.040 --> 00:00:23.500 align:middle line:84%
When you're reading a poem
that you're involved in the--

00:00:23.500 --> 00:00:29.150 align:middle line:84%
[INAUDIBLE] was when reading a
text which resists [INAUDIBLE]..

00:00:29.438 --> 00:00:33.255 align:middle line:84%
En lisant un texte qui résiste,
je me trouve dans l'élément de l'écriture.

00:00:33.459 --> 00:00:35.207 align:middle line:90%
C'est une citation de vous-même.

00:00:35.412 --> 00:00:37.925 align:middle line:84%
C'est moi qui ai dit ça ?
- Oui, apparemment.

00:00:39.638 --> 00:00:40.731 align:middle line:90%
Je ne comprends pas.

00:00:43.565 --> 00:00:45.909 align:middle line:84%
Est-ce que vous pouvez
donner un exemple

00:00:45.964 --> 00:00:47.275 align:middle line:90%
d'un texte qui résiste ?

00:00:47.508 --> 00:00:49.147 align:middle line:90%
C'est ça en gros, la question.

00:00:49.961 --> 00:00:51.562 align:middle line:90%
Tous les textes résistent.

00:00:51.920 --> 00:00:53.600 align:middle line:90%
What do you mean by [INAUDIBLE]?

00:00:53.600 --> 00:00:54.875 align:middle line:90%
What is my phrase exactly?

00:00:54.875 --> 00:00:57.790 align:middle line:90%


00:00:57.790 --> 00:00:58.290 align:middle line:90%
No.

00:00:58.290 --> 00:01:02.240 align:middle line:84%
The idea remember was
something like that.

00:01:02.240 --> 00:01:09.170 align:middle line:84%
There is no difference
between thinking, speaking,

00:01:09.170 --> 00:01:10.940 align:middle line:90%
and writing.

00:01:10.940 --> 00:01:14.840 align:middle line:84%
Of course our habits, and
especially in philosophy,

00:01:14.840 --> 00:01:18.080 align:middle line:84%
it is one of the task
for the deconstruction

00:01:18.080 --> 00:01:20.880 align:middle line:90%
precisely that-- Bon, fermer la parenthèse.

00:01:20.880 --> 00:01:27.690 align:middle line:84%
So usually you say "I think"
after that I express myself,

00:01:27.690 --> 00:01:29.820 align:middle line:84%
so that speaking and
saying these things.

00:01:29.820 --> 00:01:33.260 align:middle line:84%
And eventually at the
end of this book I write.

00:01:33.260 --> 00:01:41.030 align:middle line:84%
So I suppose that this phrase
was oriented for this idea.

00:01:41.030 --> 00:01:45.020 align:middle line:84%
No differently, thinking,
speaking, writing, the same.

00:01:45.020 --> 00:01:46.200 align:middle line:90%
Exactly the same.

00:01:46.200 --> 00:01:56.750 align:middle line:84%
So it's also a way to refer
to the so-called grammatology.

00:01:56.750 --> 00:01:59.480 align:middle line:84%
But I don't want to
give you a course

00:01:59.480 --> 00:02:01.780 align:middle line:90%
about grammatology tonight.

00:02:01.836 --> 00:02:03.195 align:middle line:90%
C'est quelque chose comme ça.

00:02:03.216 --> 00:02:05.727 align:middle line:84%
La phrase exactement, c'était quoi ?
Je n'ai pas entendu.

00:02:06.260 --> 00:02:08.271 align:middle line:84%
What was the phrase
you [INAUDIBLE]??

00:02:08.271 --> 00:02:08.771 align:middle line:90%


00:02:08.771 --> 00:02:12.250 align:middle line:84%
Well, I'll give you the sentence
before also that you said,

00:02:12.250 --> 00:02:15.968 align:middle line:84%
"To write is to struggle against
[INAUDIBLE] the [INAUDIBLE]

00:02:15.968 --> 00:02:19.160 align:middle line:84%
and disappearance of that which
seems worthwhile to be pursued,

00:02:19.160 --> 00:02:20.600 align:middle line:90%
tracked, gathered.

00:02:20.600 --> 00:02:23.087 align:middle line:84%
And then when reading
a text which resists,

00:02:23.087 --> 00:02:26.069 align:middle line:84%
and which I perceive
[INAUDIBLE],

00:02:26.069 --> 00:02:29.060 align:middle line:90%
I'm the element of writing.

00:02:32.075 --> 00:02:34.067 align:middle line:90%
Ah, oui, oui. Bien sûr.

00:02:35.341 --> 00:02:38.677 align:middle line:90%
Bon, le philosophe français Malebranche

00:02:41.240 --> 00:02:43.180 align:middle line:84%
Maybe you've heard the
name of Malebranche,

00:02:43.180 --> 00:02:45.290 align:middle line:84%
Le révérand
Malebranche,

00:02:45.290 --> 00:02:49.670 align:middle line:84%
pupil of Descartes,
about 1650.

00:02:49.670 --> 00:02:50.755 align:middle line:90%
Sounds like Oliver.

00:02:50.755 --> 00:02:53.450 align:middle line:84%
He used to say
Mes pensées me résistent.

00:02:53.450 --> 00:02:58.440 align:middle line:90%


00:02:58.440 --> 00:03:00.650 align:middle line:90%
I'm struggling with [INAUDIBLE].

00:03:00.650 --> 00:03:07.440 align:middle line:84%
This struggling with
thinking is a writing.

00:03:07.440 --> 00:03:12.570 align:middle line:84%
Of course, how could you think
and struggle with thinking,

00:03:12.570 --> 00:03:16.270 align:middle line:84%
I mean searching is,
again, without writing.

00:03:16.270 --> 00:03:19.590 align:middle line:84%
Even if you don't write with a
pen it doesn't matter you write

00:03:19.590 --> 00:03:24.866 align:middle line:90%
otherwise there is a La France.

00:03:24.866 --> 00:03:27.630 align:middle line:90%
La phrase, l'articulation de la pensée.

00:03:27.630 --> 00:03:33.430 align:middle line:90%
This is the writing.

00:03:33.430 --> 00:03:34.980 align:middle line:90%
Good.