WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.850 align:middle line:90% 00:00:04.850 --> 00:00:09.230 align:middle line:84% I agree with the whole notion that I don't think 00:00:09.230 --> 00:00:11.710 align:middle line:90% print is dead, by any means. 00:00:11.710 --> 00:00:14.960 align:middle line:84% And I don't think it really ever can or will. 00:00:14.960 --> 00:00:17.840 align:middle line:84% I do a lot of digital work and I'm very invested 00:00:17.840 --> 00:00:20.690 align:middle line:84% in the digital, but I also do a lot of publishing, 00:00:20.690 --> 00:00:23.840 align:middle line:84% some in conjunction with my wife with one business, 00:00:23.840 --> 00:00:25.910 align:middle line:84% and then I have a couple of other businesses 00:00:25.910 --> 00:00:28.100 align:middle line:90% that are completely separate. 00:00:28.100 --> 00:00:33.680 align:middle line:84% I am really interested in when the digital can facilitate 00:00:33.680 --> 00:00:37.250 align:middle line:84% the analog, when it can help us to do things better 00:00:37.250 --> 00:00:42.140 align:middle line:84% in a way that can't be done otherwise. 00:00:42.140 --> 00:00:44.090 align:middle line:84% The advances in desktop publishing 00:00:44.090 --> 00:00:48.680 align:middle line:84% have made it possible for anybody with any sort of design 00:00:48.680 --> 00:00:52.080 align:middle line:84% sense to put together a beautiful publication 00:00:52.080 --> 00:00:53.880 align:middle line:84% on their own and get it out there. 00:00:53.880 --> 00:00:58.300 align:middle line:84% It's really not hard anymore to be published. 00:00:58.300 --> 00:01:00.230 align:middle line:84% I'm also interested in the places 00:01:00.230 --> 00:01:05.600 align:middle line:84% where the digital confuses what it really even means 00:01:05.600 --> 00:01:07.730 align:middle line:90% to be published today. 00:01:07.730 --> 00:01:09.830 align:middle line:84% There's really interesting points 00:01:09.830 --> 00:01:12.920 align:middle line:90% in just how to cite a web page. 00:01:12.920 --> 00:01:14.900 align:middle line:84% The fact that web pages can even be cited 00:01:14.900 --> 00:01:18.740 align:middle line:84% is pretty amazing, too, to me, as an authoritative document, 00:01:18.740 --> 00:01:22.220 align:middle line:84% when it's something that is so in-transit. 00:01:22.220 --> 00:01:24.800 align:middle line:84% It's so malleable and so changeable. 00:01:24.800 --> 00:01:28.790 align:middle line:84% And I think it's indicative of that whole issue, 00:01:28.790 --> 00:01:32.240 align:middle line:84% that the correct way today to cite a website-- 00:01:32.240 --> 00:01:34.580 align:middle line:84% you have to say when you went there. 00:01:34.580 --> 00:01:35.883 align:middle line:90% The time. 00:01:35.883 --> 00:01:37.550 align:middle line:84% So that if somebody goes to check you up 00:01:37.550 --> 00:01:40.580 align:middle line:84% and it's different, you can at least say, it changed. 00:01:40.580 --> 00:01:45.500 align:middle line:84% Which is just a wild notion to me, that all of these things 00:01:45.500 --> 00:01:46.310 align:middle line:90% are shifting. 00:01:46.310 --> 00:01:47.885 align:middle line:84% And I don't have the answer, and I 00:01:47.885 --> 00:01:50.510 align:middle line:84% think it's a really interesting, one of the most exciting times 00:01:50.510 --> 00:01:53.150 align:middle line:84% to be a writer and to be a publisher, 00:01:53.150 --> 00:01:57.410 align:middle line:84% because of all of the analog things that the digital can 00:01:57.410 --> 00:01:59.450 align:middle line:84% help facilitate and allow people to do, 00:01:59.450 --> 00:02:03.090 align:middle line:84% that they were really never able to do before. 00:02:03.090 --> 00:02:11.030 align:middle line:84% So I came I as a writer, first, and I began publishing 00:02:11.030 --> 00:02:12.830 align:middle line:90% as a form of advocacy. 00:02:12.830 --> 00:02:15.200 align:middle line:84% I saw that there were kinds of work 00:02:15.200 --> 00:02:17.750 align:middle line:84% out there that were not being published, 00:02:17.750 --> 00:02:21.348 align:middle line:84% and so I decided that I would light a candle 00:02:21.348 --> 00:02:22.640 align:middle line:90% rather than curse the darkness. 00:02:22.640 --> 00:02:24.312 align:middle line:84% If there's no place for this stuff, 00:02:24.312 --> 00:02:25.520 align:middle line:90% well, there's an opportunity. 00:02:25.520 --> 00:02:27.080 align:middle line:84% I know people are making this stuff. 00:02:27.080 --> 00:02:28.872 align:middle line:84% I know people are interested in this stuff, 00:02:28.872 --> 00:02:30.360 align:middle line:84% so let me get the tools and let me 00:02:30.360 --> 00:02:31.610 align:middle line:90% start-- we started publishing. 00:02:31.610 --> 00:02:34.200 align:middle line:90% So that's how I came to it. 00:02:34.200 --> 00:02:39.320 align:middle line:84% And now, after maybe 15 years of publishing, 00:02:39.320 --> 00:02:45.020 align:middle line:84% I find I am increasingly interested in solving 00:02:45.020 --> 00:02:48.080 align:middle line:90% this problem of distribution. 00:02:48.080 --> 00:02:50.357 align:middle line:90% Which-- give you a good example. 00:02:50.357 --> 00:02:52.940 align:middle line:84% There's a lot of people come to me and they talk to me about-- 00:02:52.940 --> 00:02:55.310 align:middle line:84% I mean, Amazon has totally integrated 00:02:55.310 --> 00:03:00.140 align:middle line:84% this whole publishing program where they give you 00:03:00.140 --> 00:03:01.820 align:middle line:84% all the tools, all the templates, 00:03:01.820 --> 00:03:03.705 align:middle line:84% and they will walk you through this thing 00:03:03.705 --> 00:03:05.330 align:middle line:84% and attempt to sell you design services 00:03:05.330 --> 00:03:06.608 align:middle line:90% at every step along the way. 00:03:06.608 --> 00:03:07.650 align:middle line:90% But it's not a bad thing. 00:03:07.650 --> 00:03:09.230 align:middle line:84% I don't begrudge them that, I mean, they're a business. 00:03:09.230 --> 00:03:10.480 align:middle line:90% That's what they're there for. 00:03:10.480 --> 00:03:13.700 align:middle line:84% They're not there to be a charity organization. 00:03:13.700 --> 00:03:17.510 align:middle line:84% And it is really hard to design a good book, and at some point, 00:03:17.510 --> 00:03:18.950 align:middle line:84% many writers may decide, you know 00:03:18.950 --> 00:03:20.805 align:middle line:84% what, I would rather pay somebody to do this 00:03:20.805 --> 00:03:21.680 align:middle line:90% than to do it myself. 00:03:21.680 --> 00:03:24.360 align:middle line:84% So I mean, I see a decent balance there. 00:03:24.360 --> 00:03:27.230 align:middle line:84% But what terrifies me about that whole structure that they're 00:03:27.230 --> 00:03:29.830 align:middle line:84% trying to do, is, I mean, it's a closed garden. 00:03:29.830 --> 00:03:32.150 align:middle line:84% They're intending to monopolize a situation that 00:03:32.150 --> 00:03:33.560 align:middle line:90% is really terrifying. 00:03:33.560 --> 00:03:36.170 align:middle line:84% From when you consider that a lot of these things that 00:03:36.170 --> 00:03:39.140 align:middle line:84% get published can only be viewed on their devices, 00:03:39.140 --> 00:03:42.260 align:middle line:84% and the whole digital rights management aspect 00:03:42.260 --> 00:03:43.970 align:middle line:84% is something that really concerns me, 00:03:43.970 --> 00:03:48.120 align:middle line:84% and they have a lot of issues with all those things. 00:03:48.120 --> 00:03:53.277 align:middle line:84% But what I'm interested in is people are attracted to Amazon 00:03:53.277 --> 00:03:54.860 align:middle line:84% because they think, oh my God, there's 00:03:54.860 --> 00:03:58.380 align:middle line:84% millions of people who are going to get my book. 00:03:58.380 --> 00:03:59.342 align:middle line:90% But they're not. 00:03:59.342 --> 00:04:00.800 align:middle line:84% They're not going to get your book. 00:04:00.800 --> 00:04:02.240 align:middle line:84% You're going to be there and there's a chance 00:04:02.240 --> 00:04:04.323 align:middle line:84% that you will be exposed to some potential readers 00:04:04.323 --> 00:04:07.010 align:middle line:84% that you might not otherwise be exposed to, 00:04:07.010 --> 00:04:11.060 align:middle line:84% but I think it's really misrepresentative of what 00:04:11.060 --> 00:04:13.700 align:middle line:84% it is they offer, to suggest that they are offering 00:04:13.700 --> 00:04:15.770 align:middle line:84% broad distribution, when in fact, they 00:04:15.770 --> 00:04:18.589 align:middle line:84% are offering the potential for broad distribution. 00:04:18.589 --> 00:04:20.269 align:middle line:84% And those two things are not identical. 00:04:20.269 --> 00:04:22.610 align:middle line:84% I think it's important for people to realize that. 00:04:22.610 --> 00:04:26.480 align:middle line:84% So my efforts have been, as a publisher-- 00:04:26.480 --> 00:04:29.000 align:middle line:84% I'll probably get in trouble for saying this, but-- 00:04:29.000 --> 00:04:31.280 align:middle line:84% as a publisher, one of the most astonishing things 00:04:31.280 --> 00:04:36.020 align:middle line:84% that I learned was how few books of poetry actually sell. 00:04:36.020 --> 00:04:37.020 align:middle line:90% You wouldn't believe it. 00:04:37.020 --> 00:04:38.972 align:middle line:84% You wouldn't believe it if I told you. 00:04:38.972 --> 00:04:40.430 align:middle line:84% You would believe it if I told you. 00:04:40.430 --> 00:04:41.262 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:04:41.262 --> 00:04:42.540 align:middle line:90% We all believe it. 00:04:42.540 --> 00:04:43.690 align:middle line:90% We believe you. 00:04:43.690 --> 00:04:44.570 align:middle line:90% [LAUGHTER] 00:04:44.570 --> 00:04:46.300 align:middle line:90% It's astonishing. 00:04:46.300 --> 00:04:49.790 align:middle line:84% And it's not just that people don't buy books of poetry. 00:04:49.790 --> 00:04:52.280 align:middle line:84% Poets don't even buy books of poetry. 00:04:52.280 --> 00:04:54.500 align:middle line:90% I mean, it's terrifying. 00:04:54.500 --> 00:04:57.120 align:middle line:84% But again, it's something that I looked at it, 00:04:57.120 --> 00:04:59.310 align:middle line:84% and I thought to myself, this is a problem. 00:04:59.310 --> 00:05:01.338 align:middle line:84% How can I work towards solving it? 00:05:01.338 --> 00:05:03.380 align:middle line:84% And so I have been doing a lot of things that are 00:05:03.380 --> 00:05:10.220 align:middle line:84% project-based, that involve trying to generate-- 00:05:10.220 --> 00:05:15.110 align:middle line:84% trying to make projects that grow their own market, which 00:05:15.110 --> 00:05:16.460 align:middle line:90% I think is-- 00:05:16.460 --> 00:05:19.070 align:middle line:84% will, long-term, help grow the whole market. 00:05:19.070 --> 00:05:22.730 align:middle line:84% And so I'm looking at ways of doing projects 00:05:22.730 --> 00:05:25.100 align:middle line:84% that either have a built-in readership, 00:05:25.100 --> 00:05:29.420 align:middle line:84% or have unique, digitally-facilitated methods 00:05:29.420 --> 00:05:32.910 align:middle line:90% of expanding a readership. 00:05:32.910 --> 00:05:35.060 align:middle line:84% So I'm interested in exploring this notion of how 00:05:35.060 --> 00:05:40.550 align:middle line:84% the digital can get us more actual distribution, and not 00:05:40.550 --> 00:05:44.920 align:middle line:84% necessarily more potential distribution. 00:05:44.920 --> 00:05:46.000 align:middle line:90%